Jun. 3rd, 2016

page_on_stage: (Default)
★★☆☆☆

When I booked my ticket to see Doctor Faustus at The Duke of York's Theatre I was very aware that it would be my first review on this blog. I was really hoping to see something that would blow me away, I wanted to be able to sing its praises and make this first post a really positive one. I have never wanted to be a mean critic, it would be much too easy to sit back and nit pick every little perceived fault in a show from the (relative) comfort of a little fold down seat, safely hidden amidst a sea of strangers in the dark. The amount of time and energy that goes into theatre deserves more consideration and respect than that. Unfortunately I also promised myself that, above all, I would be an honest critic, which is why it pains me to say that the review which you are about to read is less glowing praise and applause, and more scowling and muttering under one's breath in a disgruntled manner.



The fact that I arrived five minutes before curtain-up and the theatre was still half empty should have been the first sign that something was amiss. I sat down and was quickly asked to move again by a member of staff who informed me that I was being upgraded. This is how I managed to watch Doctor Faustus at The Duke of York's Theatre from a very good seat in the stalls for a mere £25. Incredible value for money! At least that's what I thought before the lights went down...

Almost from start to finish Doctor Faustus was messy, that's the only way to describe it. There were too many ideas flying about, too many concepts, too many 'clever' plans for it, and not a single one of them was completely followed through on. It started off with a promising opening, with Faustus played by Kit Harington (Game of Thrones) bare foot and bundled up in a grey hoodie and tracksuit bottoms, fixated on a television screen amidst a dingy, council-flat-chic set. As the first lines of dialogue were spoken the play seemed to be going for a 'displaced and disillusioned youth' narrative, Faustus's character bringing to mind a young man in a world with nothing to offer him. He seemed like the sort of youth who's mugshot might be found pictured below a murder headline, the angsty young man who couldn't get a decent job or a girlfriend so wallowed in self-pity, stewing in his own perception of how unfair life is until finally losing it. The sort of kid described by the press as a 'mentally disturbed lone wolf' let down by the system, ultimately going out into a public place with a shotgun to let loose a few rounds into innocent civilians. Faustus came across as a creepy, introverted creature, dwelling in a cave-like bedroom and finding solace in an obsession with demons, magic, and the occult on online forums.
At least for the for the first ten minutes.

If The Jamie Lloyd Company had chosen to stick with this initial concept they could have made a more than decent bit of theatre, but just as it was getting into its stride it seemed to falter and morph into something different. There was suddenly a gratuitous amount of vomit, spit, blood, shit, and sexual attacks happening all over the place, with some full frontal nudity thrown in for good measure. I'm not the sort of audience member who's sensibilities are too delicate for this sort of theatre, but I do take offence when it's done for shock value alone. It all seemed totally unnecessary. I wondered whether the creators thought they were putting on Sarah Kane's 'Cleansed' over at the National and had stumbled, fistfuls of blood capsules in hand, into the wrong theatre.

faustus.jpg


Knowing that a large part of the play had been re-written by Colin Teevan, I had joked with the friend who was accompanying me that the new bits might be better than the parts with the original Elizabethan script. To my horror this ended up being the case. Many of the cast, Harington not excluded, were guilty of simply orating their lines from Christopher Marlowe's portions of the play, butchering the script until it was void of one ounce of empathy or emotional engagement and losing the meaning completely. It was as if the cast were going through the necessary evils of the Ye Olde Script and just waiting for it to be over so that the modern bit, which started about twenty minutes into the play, could kick in. The Marlovian script being replaced halfway through the first act with a twenty first century script was something else that, sadly, just didn't work at all. On paper it probably sounded great, but the reality of it was puzzling and felt unnecessary. The Elizabethan scenes were without a doubt the weakest and hung off of either end of the new modern script at odd angles as though they'd been badly bolted on with the wrong kinds of fixtures by someone who'd never done DIY before.

Doctor Faustus was trashy and it was tacky, and that was probably its only saving grace. The trashiness and tackiness almost succeeded in enhancing and highlighting some of the attempted themes of capitalism, political corruption, and media saturation. It could have been a great play, or at least a good one, if it had had the courage of its conviction and just followed through on one or two of its themes instead of skirting around the edge of a mess of different things. If it was trying to be controversial it failed. If it was trying to be poignant it failed. If it was trying to tell us something about modern celebrity it sort of missed the mark there too, especially when you consider the irony that its main pull for audiences was TV heartthrob Kit Harington, who spents half the show wearing tiny pants and not much else for some inexplicable reason. The direction was bad. It would be easy to knock Harington as a one trick pony and accuse him of a wooden and perplexingly scattered performance in the title role, but most of Doctor Faustus's main issues stemmed from some really lousy and conflicting direction, which unfortunately resulted in making the final piece feel a bit like an A-Level drama assessment.

Who was this play for? What was it trying to be?

It's a shame, there was a lot of potential here, but needless to say Christopher Marlowe is probably turning in his grave every evening while this abomination is taking place, pausing just long enough to appreciate the scenes of homo-eroticism and Mephistopheles singing 'Bat Out of Hell' on karaoke.
page_on_stage: (Default)
★★★★☆

Mrs Henderson Presents was a film based on the real life Laura Henderson who bought London's Windmill Theatre shortly before the start of the Second World War. She put on shows notorious for featuring tableaux of real nude women posing as statues and managed to find a loophole in the strict censorship laws of the time that allowed this on stage nudity, provided that the actresses didn't move.

Although I'm a big fan of the original 2005 film Mrs Henderson Presents I went into the new musical adaptation with zero expectations. For the past few years there has been a rise in the popularity of beloved movies being given the musical makeover, the outcome of which has seen musical film adaptations dominating Broadway and the West End with varying degrees of success. On the one hand this West End version of Mrs Henderson could bring a new dimension to a brilliant story, but on the other hand it could be a train wreck of lazy writing and re-hashed theatrical cliches.



I was pleasantly surprised to find that Mrs Henderson Presents at the Noel Coward Theatre was a fantastic and fitting tribute to the film, as well as being a wonderful show in its own right. There was nothing about it that you could call 'fresh', but it held its own all the same and was a delightfully entertaining way to pass a Saturday afternoon. It was fun, sad, and poignant in equal measure, and although it couldn't be described as lyrically brilliant, it was sweet, simple, and had a ton of heart. Three simple but powerful ballads carried the show musically, performed with genuine feeling and oodles of talent that induced that heart-in-the-throat goosebumps sensation musicals enthusiasts crave. The other numbers were delightfully music hall and, though they were rather forgettable, I can remember that they were very good fun!

The nudity was tasteful and artistic as it should have been, it was never played for cheap laughs to attract a leering crowd, and at no point did it ever feel seedy or dirty. The actresses carried themselves with great dignity and even when one of them came to the front of the stage completely nude, stood in all her glory just meters away from the audience, and flipped the V at Hitler and the war there was nothing to be ashamed of, not for the actress or the audience. In fact it was easy to forget that she wasn't wearing clothes as she had such a presence and a sense of real moxie about her. It was a celebration of the female form, a triumph of sisterhood, girl power, and the beauty of the underdog.



At its very heart Mrs Henderson Presents was undeniably British in the very best ways. There was just the right amount of slapstick to give it some charm without making it feel like a Carry On film, and it was underpinned with the gritty patriotic determination that makes us so proud of our nation. The show was executed with just the right amount of subtlety, it got its point across but the temptation to be heavy handed with the 'futility of war' theme was resisted. The staging was simultaneously glamorous and revealing, both the worlds of the showbiz fantasy and the reality of the backstage of a theatre in Blitz age London worked in harmony so that it was easy to stay completely immersed in it all without getting whiplash whilst moving between the two.
Hats off to Tracie Bennett in the lead role of Mrs Henderson - a memorable part played with great panache by Judi Dench in the original film. Dame Judi's shoes are big ones to fill at the best of times, but Mrs. Henderson is unarguably one of her wittiest and sharpest roles, and once you factor in the singing and dancing it must have been a daunting challenge to say the least, but Bennett faced it, grabbed it with both hands, and conquered it with great success. It would be wrong to finish this review without also mentioning the incredible vocal talents of Emma Williams who played Maureen, the tea-girl turned stage star, who brought the audience to tears with her stirring performance of the song 'If Mountains Were Easy to Climb'.

Overall this was a good old-fashioned musical show which didn't exactly break the mould but which was charming and enjoyable nonetheless, and which I'd recommend seeing before the end of its run on the 18th June.

Profile

page_on_stage: (Default)
page_on_stage

December 2020

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829 3031  

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 29th, 2025 07:10 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios